SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
 
                  Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )
 
    Filed by the Registrant /X/
    Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / /
 
    Check the appropriate box:
    / /  Preliminary Proxy Statement
    / /  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
         14a-6(e)(2))
    /X/  Definitive Proxy Statement
    / /  Definitive Additional Materials
    / /  Soliciting  Material  Pursuant  to  Section  240.14a-11(c)  or  Section
         240.14a-12
                        Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
 
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 
/X/  $125 per  Exchange Act  Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii),  14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(i)(2)  or
     Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
/ /  $500  per  each party  to  the controversy  pursuant  to Exchange  Act Rule
     14a-6(i)(3).
/ /  Fee  computed  on   table  below   per  Exchange   Act  Rules   14a-6(i)(4)
     and 0-11.
     1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
        pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
        filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     5) Total fee paid:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ /  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
/ /  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
     0-11(a)(2)  and identify the  filing for which the  offsetting fee was paid
     previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement  number,
     or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
     1) Amount Previously Paid:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     3) Filing Party:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     4) Date Filed:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
[LOGO]
 
        LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION       Proxy Statement and
        111 S.W. Fifth Avenue               Notice to Stockholders of
        Portland, Oregon 97204              ANNUAL MEETING
        (503) 221-0800                      MAY 6, 1996
 
                                                                  March 26, 1996
 
Dear Stockholder:
 
    On  behalf of the Board  of Directors, I cordially  invite you to attend the
Annual Meeting  of Stockholders  of Louisiana-Pacific  Corporation. The  meeting
will  be held on Monday, May 6, 1996, at 9:30 a.m. at The Benson Hotel, 309 S.W.
Broadway, Portland,  Oregon. Your  Board  of Directors  and  I look  forward  to
greeting personally those stockholders able to be present.
 
    At  this year's meeting, in addition to  the election of three directors and
approval of the appointment of auditors, you will be asked to vote upon approval
of performance goals under an executive  bonus plan and approval of an  employee
stock  purchase plan. Your Board of  Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR
each of these proposals. Action will also be taken on any other matters that are
properly presented at the meeting, including three stockholder proposals,  which
the Board of Directors opposes for the reasons stated in the proxy statement.
 
    Regardless  of the number  of shares you  own, it is  important that they be
represented and  voted  at  the meeting  whether  or  not you  plan  to  attend.
Accordingly,  you are requested  to sign, date,  and mail the  enclosed proxy at
your earliest convenience.
 
    The accompanying proxy  statement contains important  information about  the
annual  meeting and your corporation. On behalf of the Board of Directors, thank
you for your continued interest and support.
 
Sincerely,
 
[SIGNATURE]
 
Mark A. Suwyn
CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

    On written request, Louisiana-Pacific will  provide, without charge, a  copy
of  the Corporation's Form  10-K Report for  1995 filed with  the Securities and
Exchange Commission  (including  the  financial  statements  and  the  schedules
thereto and a list briefly describing the exhibits thereto) to any record holder
or  beneficial owner of  the Corporation's common  stock on March  14, 1996, the
record date  for the  1996 Annual  Meeting, or  to any  person who  subsequently
becomes  such a record holder or beneficial owner. The reports will be available
for mailing in April 1996. Requests should be sent to: Pamela A. Selis, Director
of Corporate  Communications,  Louisiana-Pacific  Corporation,  111  S.W.  Fifth
Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204.

                         LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION
 
                    NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
 
                                  May 6, 1996
 
    The  Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation ("L-P")
will be  held at  The Benson  Hotel,  309 S.W.  Broadway, Portland,  Oregon,  on
Monday,  May 6, 1996,  at 9:30 a.m., local  time, to consider  and vote upon the
following matters:
 
    1.  Election of three Class II directors.
 
    2.  Approval of performance goals under a performance-based incentive  bonus
plan.
 
    3.  Approval of the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
 
    4.   Approval of the appointment  of Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public
accountants, to examine L-P's financial statements for 1996.
 
    5.  A stockholder's proposal, NOT recommended by management, relating to the
classification of the Board of Directors, if properly presented at the meeting.
 
    6.  A  stockholder's proposal,  NOT recommended by  management, relating  to
personal liability of directors, if properly presented at the meeting.
 
    7.   A  stockholder's proposal, NOT  recommended by  management, relating to
compensation and workplace policies.
 
    Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 1996,  are
entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.
 
                                          ANTON C. KIRCHHOF, SECRETARY
 
Portland, Oregon
March 26, 1996
 
    WHETHER  OR NOT YOU EXPECT  TO ATTEND THE MEETING,  PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE
ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN  ORDER THAT YOUR STOCK MAY BE VOTED  IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE PROXY STATEMENT. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU
MAY WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY AND VOTE IN PERSON.

                                PROXY STATEMENT
 
    Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("L-P"), is soliciting
proxies  on behalf  of its  Board of Directors  to be  voted at  the 1996 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders (including any  adjournment of the meeting). This  proxy
statement  and the accompanying proxy card  are first being sent to stockholders
on approximately March 26, 1996.
 
                                VOTING PROCEDURE
 
    A proxy card is enclosed for your use. To vote by proxy, please sign,  date,
and  return the proxy card promptly. For  your convenience, a return envelope is
enclosed, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States.
 
    You may indicate your  voting instructions on the  proxy card in the  spaces
provided.  Properly completed proxies will be voted as instructed. If you return
a proxy without  indicating voting instructions,  your shares will  be voted  in
accordance  with the recommendations  of the Board  of Directors --  FOR items 1
through 4  listed  on  the  notice  of annual  meeting  and  AGAINST  the  three
stockholder  proposals  listed as  items 5,  6, and  7 on  the notice  of annual
meeting.
 
    If you return a proxy card, you may revoke it (i) by filing either a written
notice of revocation or a  properly signed proxy bearing  a later date with  the
Secretary  of L-P at any time before the meeting, or (ii) by voting in person at
the annual meeting.
 
    If you participate in  the Automatic Dividend  Reinvestment Plan offered  by
First Chicago Trust Company of New York, all the shares held for your account in
the plan will be voted in the same manner as shares you vote by proxy. If you do
not  vote by proxy, the shares held for  your account under the plan will not be
voted.
 
    Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 1996,  are
entitled  to receive notice of the annual meeting and to vote at the meeting. At
the record date,  there were 108,584,031  shares of common  stock, $1 par  value
("Common Stock") outstanding. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote
on  each matter to be acted upon. A majority of the outstanding shares of Common
Stock  represented  at  the  meeting   will  constitute  a  quorum.   Additional
information  concerning holders of  outstanding Common Stock  may be found under
the heading "Holders of Common Stock" below. Only stockholders and their proxies
are entitled to attend the annual meeting.
 
    The Board  of  Directors has  adopted  a confidential  voting  policy  which
provides that the voting instructions of stockholders are not to be disclosed to
L-P  except (i) in the  case of communications intended  for management, (ii) in
the event of certain contested matters, or (iii) as required by law. Votes  will
be  tabulated by independent tabulators and  summaries of the tabulation will be
provided to management.
 
                        ITEM 1 -- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
 
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
 
    As previously reported, in July 1995, three directors and executive officers
of L-P, Harry A. Merlo,  James Eisses, and Ronald  L. Paul, resigned from  their
positions with L-P. Donald R. Kayser, a director and former executive officer of
L-P,  agreed to  serve as  Chairman and  Chief Executive  Officer on  an interim
basis, a  position  he  held until  Mark  A.  Suwyn became  Chairman  and  Chief
Executive  Officer on  January 2,  1996. Also  in July  1995, Lee  C. Simpson, a
former director and  executive officer, agreed  to return as  a director and  as
interim  President and Chief  Operating Officer, a position  he held until March
15, 1996.
 
    Securities and Exchange  Commission rules specify  the items of  information
that  must  appear  in  this  proxy  statement,  including  certain  information
concerning former officers  and directors.  In reviewing the  remainder of  this
proxy statement, stockholders should bear in mind that the information presented
reflects not only the current management and Board of Directors of L-P, but also
reflects  the former management and  the effects of the  recent changes in L-P's
Board of Directors and executive officers.
 
                                       1

NOMINEES
 
    Two of the nominees for  the board positions to be  voted on at the  meeting
are  now members of the Board of  Directors and the third nominee, Mr. Flaherty,
is proposed to fill a vacancy on the board of directors. The term of office  for
the  positions to be voted on will  expire at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
in 1999. The nominees are:
 
PIERRE S. DU PONT                                 NOMINEE FOR TERM EXPIRING 1999
 
    Pierre S. du Pont, age  61, has been a director  since August 1991. He is  a
partner  in the Wilmington, Delaware, law firm  of Richards, Layton & Finger. He
is a former governor of Delaware and a former member of the United States  House
of  Representatives. Gov. du Pont is also a director of Northwestern Mutual Life
Insurance Co. and Whitman Corporation.
 
WILLIAM E. FLAHERTY                               NOMINEE FOR TERM EXPIRING 1999
 
    William E. Flaherty,  age 63,  was nominated by  the Board  of Directors  in
March 1996 to fill a vacancy on the Board. Mr. Flaherty is Chairman of the Board
and   a  director  of  Horsehead   Resource  Development  Co.,  Inc.,  Horsehead
Industries, Inc.,  Great  Lakes  Labor  Corporation,  and  Zina  Corporation  of
America.
 
DONALD R. KAYSER                                  NOMINEE FOR TERM EXPIRING 1999
 
    Donald  R. Kayser,  age 65, served  as interim Chairman  and Chief Executive
Officer of L-P from July 28, 1995, to January 2, 1996. At present, he serves  as
a  consultant to L-P,  a position expected  to continue through  April 1996. Mr.
Kayser retired from his position as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Morrison Knudsen  Corporation in 1990. He  was Senior Vice  President
and  Chief Financial Officer of Allied Signal  Inc., until July 1988. Mr. Kayser
was an executive officer of L-P until 1982 and has been a director of L-P  since
1972. Mr. Kayser is also a director of Guy F. Atkinson Company of California.
 
    YOUR SHARES REPRESENTED BY A PROPERLY COMPLETED AND RETURNED PROXY CARD WILL
BE  VOTED FOR  THE ELECTION OF  THE THREE  NOMINEES UNLESS AUTHORITY  TO VOTE IS
WITHHELD. If any  of the  nominees becomes unavailable  to serve  (which is  not
anticipated),  your proxy will  be voted for a  substitute nominee designated by
the Board of Directors.
 
    The three  nominees receiving  the highest  total number  of votes  will  be
elected.  Shares  not  voted  for the  election  of  directors,  whether because
authority to vote  is withheld,  because the record  holder failed  to return  a
proxy,  because the  broker holding  the shares  did not  vote on  such issue or
otherwise, will not  count in  determining the total  number of  votes for  each
nominee.
 
CONTINUING DIRECTORS
 
    The  other current members of the Board  of Directors, whose terms of office
will continue beyond the 1996 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, are:
 
BONNIE GUITON HILL                                     CURRENT TERM EXPIRES 1997
 
    Bonnie Guiton Hill, age 54, has been a director of L-P since 1993. Ms.  Hill
has  been Dean of the McIntire School  of Commerce at the University of Virginia
since July 1992.  From February  1991 to  July 1992,  she was  Secretary of  the
California  State and Consumer Services Agency.  From September 1990 to February
1991,  Ms.  Hill  was  President  of  Earth  Conservation  Corp.,  a   nonprofit
organization.  From April 1989 to September 1990, she was Director of the United
States Office  of Consumer  Affairs and  Special Advisor  to the  President  for
Consumer  Affairs. Prior  to that  time, she  served as  Assistant Secretary for
Vocational and Adult Education in the United States Department of Education. Ms.
Hill is also  a director of  AK Steel Corporation,  Crestar Financial  Services,
Hershey Foods Corporation, and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
 
                                       2

FRANCINE I. NEFF                                       CURRENT TERM EXPIRES 1997
 
    Francine I. Neff, age 70, has served as a director of L-P since 1984. She is
Vice  President of  Nets, Inc., a  private investment corporation.  Mrs. Neff is
also a director of Hershey Foods Corporation and D.R. Horton, Inc. and serves on
the advisory board of E-Systems, Inc.  She was formerly Treasurer of the  United
States and National Director of the U.S. Savings Bonds Division.
 
LEE C. SIMPSON                                         CURRENT TERM EXPIRES 1998
 
    Lee  C. Simpson, age 61, became President and Chief Operating Officer of L-P
on an interim basis  (a position he  held until March 1996)  and was elected  to
fill  a vacancy  on the Board  of Directors in  July 1995. He  was previously an
executive officer of L-P from 1972 until  his retirement in 1991, and he  served
as a director of L-P from 1972 until 1993. Mr. Simpson's son, Robert M. Simpson,
became  general manager of  L-P's Western Division  in 1992, a  position he held
until January 1996.
 
MARK A. SUWYN                                          CURRENT TERM EXPIRES 1997
 
    Mark A. Suwyn, age 53, became  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of  L-P,
and was elected to fill a vacancy on its Board of Directors effective January 2,
1996. Mr. Suwyn was Executive Vice President of International Paper Company from
1992  through 1995. Previously, he was Senior  Vice President of E.I. du Pont de
Nemours & Co.
 
CHARLES E. YEAGER                                      CURRENT TERM EXPIRES 1998
 
    Charles E. Yeager, age 73, is a retired Brigadier General, United States Air
Force. Gen. Yeager has been a director of L-P since 1984.
 
BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS
 
    During 1995, the Board of Directors held four regular quarterly meetings and
eleven special meetings, seven of which were telephone conference meetings. Each
director attended at least 75 percent of the total number of the meetings of the
board and the meetings held  by all committees of the  board on which he or  she
served during 1995.
 
AUDIT COMMITTEE
 
    The  Board of Directors has an  Audit Committee presently consisting of Mrs.
Neff, Chairman, Gov.  du Pont,  Ms. Hill, Mr.  Kayser, and  Gen. Yeager.  During
1995,  the  Audit Committee  held two  meetings,  one of  which was  a telephone
conference meeting. The Audit  Committee reviews and reports  to the board  with
respect  to various auditing and accounting  matters, including the selection of
independent public  accountants for  L-P,  the scope  of audit  procedures,  the
services  to be performed by and the fees to be paid to L-P's independent public
accountants, the performance of such accountants and of L-P's internal auditors,
and the accounting practices of L-P.
 
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE -- INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
 
    The Board  of  Directors has  a  Compensation Committee  consisting  of  the
following  directors: Gov. du  Pont, Chairman, Ms. Hill,  Mr. Kayser, Mrs. Neff,
and Gen. Yeager. Mr. Kayser was an executive officer of L-P until 1982 and for a
portion of  1995 during  which time  he was  not a  member of  the  Compensation
Committee.
 
    The Compensation Committee held three meetings during 1995, one of which was
a  telephone conference meeting.  The Compensation Committee's  functions are to
make awards under and to administer L-P's Key Employee Restricted Stock Plan, to
administer L-P's 1984 and 1991 Employee  Stock Option Plans with respect to  the
participation  of employees who are officers  or directors of L-P, including the
granting of  stock  options  to  those  employees,  and  to  consider  and  make
recommendations to the board regarding all other forms of compensation for L-P's
executive officers, including salaries and bonuses.
 
    During  1995, L-P paid $309,870 to the law firm of Richards, Layton & Finger
(in which Gov. du Pont is a partner) for legal services, including an advance of
legal expenses incurred by the individual directors
 
                                       3

of L-P (other than Messrs. Suwyn and  Simpson), who were named as defendants  in
derivative  lawsuits filed by stockholders of L-P. The lawsuits seek damages for
alleged mismanagement and breach  of fiduciary duties  related to various  other
legal proceedings now pending against L-P.
 
    Information  concerning executive compensation is  set forth below under the
caption "Executive Compensation."
 
ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
 
    The Board of Directors has an Environmental Affairs Committee, consisting of
Ms. Hill, Chairman, Gov. du  Pont, Mr. Kayser, Mrs.  Neff, and Gen. Yeager.  The
Environmental   Affairs  Committee,  which  met   four  times  during  1995,  is
responsible for reviewing  the effectiveness of  L-P's environmental  compliance
program.
 
NOMINATING COMMITTEE; NOMINATIONS FOR DIRECTOR
 
    The Board of Directors has a Nominating Committee consisting of members Gen.
Yeager,  Chairman, Gov. du Pont, Ms. Hill, Mr. Kayser, Mr. Suwyn, and Mrs. Neff.
During 1995, the Nominating Committee held one meeting. The Nominating Committee
is authorized to  establish procedures  for selecting  and evaluating  potential
nominees  for director and to  recommend to the Board  of Directors criteria for
membership on the Board  of Directors, policies on  the size and composition  of
the  board, candidates for director, and the composition of board committees. It
will consider stockholders'  recommendations concerning  nominees for  director.
Any such recommendation, including the name and qualifications of a nominee, may
be  submitted  to  L-P  to  the attention  of  the  Chairman  of  the Nominating
Committee.
 
    L-P's bylaws provide that nominations for election to the Board of Directors
may be made by the board or by any stockholder entitled to vote for the election
of directors. Notice of a stockholder's intent to make such a nomination must be
given in writing, by  personal delivery or certified  mail, postage prepaid,  to
the  Chairman of the  corporation and must  include the name  and address of the
stockholder and each proposed nominee, a representation that the stockholder  is
a  record holder of Common Stock and intends  to appear in person or by proxy at
the meeting  to  nominate the  person  or persons  specified  in the  notice,  a
description  of  any  arrangements  or  understandings  pursuant  to  which  the
nominations are to be made, the consent  of each proposed nominee to serve as  a
director  if elected, and such other information regarding each nominee as would
be required  to  be  included in  L-P's  proxy  statement had  the  person  been
nominated  by the Board of Directors. With respect  to an election to be held at
an annual meeting of stockholders, such notice must be given at least 60 days in
advance of the meeting or, if the meeting is held on a date other than the first
Friday in May, within 10 days after  the first public disclosure of the  meeting
date.
 
            ITEM 2 -- APPROVAL OF PERFORMANCE GOALS UNDER BONUS PLAN
 
    Under  Section 162(m)  of the  Internal Revenue  Code (the  "Code"), certain
performance-based compensation which is approved by stockholders is not  subject
to   the  $1  million  limit  on   deductibility  applicable  to  certain  other
compensation. As  described under  "Executive  Compensation --  Agreements  with
Executive  Officers," the employment agreement entered into between L-P and Mark
A. Suwyn provides that Mr. Suwyn will be eligible to receive a cash  performance
bonus  for 1996  and subsequent years.  The Compensation  Committee has adopted,
subject to  stockholder  approval  of  performance  goals,  a  performance-based
incentive  bonus plan  under which the  amount of  bonus paid to  Mr. Suwyn will
depend upon the extent to which certain performance goals are met.
 
    Performance goals will be in two general categories -- strategic performance
goals and financial performance goals. The business criteria on which  strategic
performance  goals are based may include  goals related to success in developing
and implementing strategic plans, management  plans or systems (such as  quality
management  plans, budgeting  systems, or  other internal  controls), success in
filling board or executive positions or reorganizing reporting relationships, or
success in resolving legal proceedings. The business criteria on which financial
performance goals will be based may include the degree to which L-P achieves one
or more  measures  related to  earnings,  profitability, efficiency,  or  return
 
                                       4

to stockholders. Such measures may be based on earnings, earnings per share, and
operating  profit,  stock  price,  costs of  production  or  overhead,  or other
measures (for L-P as a whole or for various divisions or units of L-P) expressed
as absolute amounts or as ratios or percentages of other amounts. Success may be
measured against various standards,  including budget targets, improvement  over
prior years, and performance relative to other companies.
 
    The  specific performance  targets and  the formulas  used to  calculate the
amount of bonus will be determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors within the  first 90 days  of the period  for which a  bonus is to  be
paid.  At present, it is anticipated that performance goals and formulas will be
established annually.
 
    Because  the  bonuses  are  payable  pursuant  to  Mr.  Suwyn's   employment
agreement,  he is the only person eligible to receive a bonus under the plan. In
March 1996,  the  Compensation Committee  approved  a bonus  award,  subject  to
stockholder approval, for Mr. Suwyn pursuant to which he will receive a bonus of
$400,000  if  goals  related  to  election  of  new  non-employee  directors and
executive officers and  approval of a  new strategic  plan for L-P  are met;  in
addition, Mr. Suwyn may receive up to an additional $100,000 if goals related to
resolution of legal proceedings, implementation of quality management plans, and
profitability  are satisfied. Bonuses in subsequent years will be at least equal
to 70 percent of his base salary.  In no event will the performance bonus  under
the  plan for any  year exceed $1 million.  Higher or lower  bonuses may be paid
upon achievement of specified greater or lesser goals than the targeted goals or
upon attainment of a greater or lesser number of goals at targeted levels.
 
    In order to have the benefit of  a federal income tax deduction for  amounts
which  may  be paid  to  Mr. Suwyn,  the  Board of  Directors  of L-P  is asking
stockholders to approve the  terms of the performance  goals as outlined  above,
which  will be used by the Compensation  Committee as a basis for specific bonus
awards. In the event  stockholders do not approve  the terms of the  performance
goals,  the plan would not be  implemented, and the Compensation Committee would
consider other methods of providing  appropriate compensation to Mr. Suwyn,  but
he would not be entitled to an automatic bonus.
 
    Approval  of the terms of the  performance goals under the performance-based
incentive bonus  plan will  require the  affirmative vote  of the  holders of  a
majority  of the  shares of  Common Stock  present, in  person or  by proxy, and
entitled to vote on such approval. Shares  of Common Stock for which a proxy  is
returned  but which  are not  voted for  approval of  the performance  goals (by
voting against  the proposal,  by abstaining,  or because  a broker  or  nominee
holding  the shares  did not  vote on such  issue) will  all have  the effect of
voting against the proposal.
 
    THE BOARD  OF  DIRECTORS  RECOMMENDS  THAT STOCKHOLDERS  VOTE  IN  FAVOR  OF
APPROVAL OF THE TERMS OF THE PERFORMANCE GOALS UNDER THE PLAN.
 
            ITEM 3 -- APPROVAL OF 1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
 
BACKGROUND
 
    On  March 20, 1996,  the Board of Directors  adopted, subject to stockholder
approval, the Louisiana-Pacific  Corporation 1996 Employee  Stock Purchase  Plan
(the  "Purchase Plan"), covering a maximum  of 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock.
The Purchase Plan allows  all employees of L-P  and certain of its  subsidiaries
the  opportunity to subscribe for shares of Common Stock on an installment basis
through payroll  deductions.  Approximately  13,000 employees  are  eligible  to
participate in the Purchase Plan. L-P has offered similar plans to its employees
for many years.
 
    The  Purchase Plan provides for two  separate offering and purchase periods.
It is anticipated that  750,000 shares will be  offered for subscription  during
each  offering period. The  first offering period will  commence on September 1,
1996, and  end on  September 30,  1996. The  first purchase  period (the  period
during  which payroll deductions are  made to pay for  the shares subscribed for
during the  first offering  period)  will end  September  30, 1998.  The  second
offering  period will commence on  September 1, 1997, and  will end on September
30, 1997. The second purchase period will end September 30, 1999.
 
                                       5

TERMS OF THE PURCHASE PLAN
 
    The subscription price per share for  each purchase period is the lesser  of
(i)  85 percent of the mean  between the high and low  sale prices for shares of
Common Stock reported on the New  York Stock Exchange -- Composite  Transactions
on  the day before the  offering period commences and  (ii) the mean between the
high and low sale prices so reported on the date the purchase period ends, or on
any earlier date of purchase provided for in the Purchase Plan. The mean between
the high and low  sale prices for  Common Stock reported on  the New York  Stock
Exchange -- Composite Transactions on March 14, 1996, was $24.50 per share.
 
    The  number of  shares that  may be  subscribed in  each offering  period is
limited in  relation to  the monthly  compensation  of each  employee, up  to  a
maximum  equal to the number of shares  which can be purchased with $21,240. The
number of  shares subscribed  and the  purchase price  per share  is subject  to
adjustment in the event of future stock dividends, stock splits or certain other
capital adjustments.
 
    An  employee  may  terminate a  subscription  at  any time  before  the full
purchase price for the subscribed shares has been paid and be refunded the  full
amount  withheld, plus  interest, at  the rate  of 6  1/4 percent  per annum. An
employee may  also reduce  the number  of subscribed  shares and  (i) receive  a
refund  of the amount withheld which is in excess of the amount which would have
been withheld if  his subscription had  been for the  reduced number of  shares,
plus  interest on the refund at the rate of 6 1/4 percent per annum or (ii) have
the excess applied to reduce the  amount of future installments of the  purchase
price.
 
    An  employee  whose  employment  is terminated  for  any  reason  other than
retirement, disability, or death (or the personal representative of an  employee
who  dies after  such termination)  may, at his  election, be  refunded the full
amount withheld, plus  interest, at  the rate  of 6  1/4 percent  per annum,  or
receive  the whole  number of  shares which could  be purchased  at the purchase
price with such amount, together with a cash refund of any balance. An  employee
who  retires or  is permanently disabled  (or the personal  representative of an
employee who dies while employed, retired,  or disabled) at any time before  the
full  purchase  price of  the subscribed  shares  has been  paid has  the rights
described above and, in addition, may  prepay the entire unpaid balance for  the
subscribed shares and receive such shares. Any such election must be made within
three months following any termination of employment and prior to the end of the
respective purchase period.
 
    A  copy of the  Purchase Plan is  attached as Exhibit  A and is incorporated
herein by reference.
 
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX ASPECTS
 
    For  purposes  of  U.S.  federal   income  taxation,  an  employee  who   is
continuously  employed by L-P or a subsidiary during the period beginning on the
offering date and ending three months before the date on which the amount of his
payments is no longer subject to withdrawal, and who makes no disposition of the
shares within one year after the date of transfer of the shares to him or within
two years after the offering date, will not receive any taxable income upon  his
subscription  or  when he  completes  payment for  or  receives delivery  of the
shares. Under these circumstances, there will be  no tax effect to L-P (it  will
not  be  entitled to  any  deduction from  income  by reason  of  the employee's
subscription or purchase). Any gain which  may be recognized by the employee  on
the  ultimate disposition of the shares will be treated as ordinary income in an
amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of the gain or (ii) the  difference
between  the maximum purchase price and the  market price of Common Stock on the
day preceding commencement of the offering. Gain in excess of such amount or any
loss on disposition will be treated as capital gain or loss.
 
    An earlier disposition of the shares will  result in any excess of the  fair
market value of the shares at the time of purchase over the purchase price being
treated  as compensation taxable to the employee at ordinary income tax rates in
the year in which the disposition occurs, in which event L-P will be entitled to
a corresponding deduction from income.
 
                                       6

STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL
 
    In order to meet federal income tax requirements, the Purchase Plan must  be
approved  by stockholders within 12 months after the date of its adoption by the
Board of Directors. Approval of the  Purchase Plan will require the  affirmative
vote  of the  holders of a  majority of the  shares of Common  Stock present, in
person or  by proxy,  and entitled  to vote  on such  approval at  a meeting  of
stockholders. Shares of Common Stock for which a proxy is returned but which are
not  voted for  approval of  the Purchase Plan  (by voting  against the Purchase
Plan, by abstaining, or because a broker or other nominee holding the shares did
not vote on such issue) will all have the effect of voting against the  Purchase
Plan.
 
    THE  BOARD OF  DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT  STOCKHOLDERS VOTE IN  FAVOR OF THE
PURCHASE PLAN.
 
                      ITEM 4 -- APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENT OF
                         INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
    The Board of Directors has appointed Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public
accountants, to examine the financial statements  of L-P for 1996. Although  the
selection  and appointment of independent public  accountants is not required to
be submitted to a  vote of the  stockholders, the board has  decided to ask  the
stockholders to approve the appointment. If the stockholders do not approve such
appointment, the board will reconsider the appointment.
 
    L-P  expects representatives  of Arthur  Andersen LLP  to be  present at the
annual meeting and  to be  available to  respond to  appropriate questions  from
stockholders.  The accountants will have the  opportunity to make a statement at
the annual meeting if they desire to do so.
 
    Approval of the appointment of the accountants will require the  affirmative
vote  of a majority of the total votes cast on this issue at the meeting. Shares
that are not represented at the meeting, shares that abstain from voting on this
issue, and shares not  voted on this  issue by brokers or  nominees will not  be
counted as voted for purposes of computing a majority.
 
                         ITEM 5 -- STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
               CONCERNING DECLASSIFICATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
    The  following proposal, NOT  recommended by management,  has been submitted
for inclusion in the  proxy statement and  action at the  annual meeting by  the
Amalgamated  Bank of New York, LongView  Collective Investment Fund, 11-15 Union
Square, New York, New York 10003:
 
    "RESOLVED: The stockholders  of Louisiana-Pacific  Corporation request  that
the  Board of  Directors take  the necessary  steps in  accordance with Delaware
state law to declassify the Board of Directors so that all directors are elected
annually, such declassification to be effected in a manner that does not  affect
the unexpired terms of directors previously elected."
 
SUPPORTING STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY STOCKHOLDER
 
    "The  election  of  directors  is the  primary  avenue  for  stockholders to
influence corporate governance policies and  to hold management accountable  for
its  implementation of those policies. We believe that the classification of the
Board of Directors, which results in only  a portion of the Board being  elected
annually, is not in the best interests of our Company and its stockholders.
 
    "The  Board of Directors of Louisiana-Pacific  is divided into three classes
serving staggered, three-year  terms. We believe  that the Company's  classified
Board  of Directors maintains the incumbency of the current Board, and therefore
of current  management,  which in  turn  limits the  Board's  accountability  to
stockholders.
 
    "The  elimination of Louisiana-Pacific's classified Board would require each
director to stand for election annually and allow stockholders an opportunity to
register their  views on  the performance  of the  Board collectively  and  each
director  individually. We believe this is one  of the best methods available to
stockholders to ensure that the company will  be managed in a manner that is  in
the best interest of stockholders.
 
                                       7

    "Over  38% of the stockholders voted for this proposal last year. We believe
that concerns  expressed by  companies with  classified boards  that the  annual
election of all directors could leave companies without experienced directors in
the  event that all incumbents  are voted out by  stockholders are unfounded. In
our view, in the unlikely event that stockholders vote to replace all directors,
this decision  would  express  stockholder dissatisfaction  with  the  incumbent
directors and reflect the need for change.
 
                   "WE URGE YOU TO VOTE FOR THIS RESOLUTION!"
 
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL 5
 
    THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL.
 
    The  Board of Directors plays an  important role in overseeing the direction
of L-P. With a  company as diverse  as L-P, it takes  time to become  acquainted
with  the various  elements of its  businesses. A classified  Board of Directors
will ordinarily result in  approximately two-thirds of  the directors having  at
least  one year  of experience  as a  director of  L-P. The  board believes this
experience  and  continuity  is  critical  to  ensure  that  stockholders   have
knowledgeable oversight provided by their elected directors.
 
    At  the  same  time,  a  classified  Board  of  Directors  does  not  hinder
stockholders from  voting  for  or  against  directors  when  they  are  up  for
reelection.  In fact, no nominee has received  less than 95 percent of the votes
cast in  the election  of  directors in  the last  five  years. Since  the  vast
majority of stockholders have consistently voiced their support of the nominees,
there  is  little  reason for  stockholders  to  vote more  frequently  for each
director.
 
    A virtually identical proposal  was voted down by  the stockholders at  last
year's  annual  meeting. This  suggests that  a  majority of  L-P's stockholders
support the benefits which result from having a classified Board of Directors.
 
    FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE  AGAINST
THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL IN ITEM 5.
 
    Approval of this stockholder proposal will require the affirmative vote of a
majority  of the total votes  cast on this item at  the meeting. Shares that are
not represented at the  meeting, shares that abstain  from voting on this  item,
and shares not voted on this item by brokers or nominees will not be counted for
purposes of computing a majority.
 
                         ITEM 6 -- STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
                         CONCERNING DIRECTOR LIABILITY
 
    The  following proposal, NOT  recommended by management,  has been submitted
for inclusion in the  proxy statement and  action at the  annual meeting by  the
National  Automatic  Sprinkler  Industry  Pension  Fund,  8000  Corporate Drive,
Landover, Maryland 20785:
 
    "RESOLVED: The  shareholders  of Louisiana-Pacific  Corporation  ("Company")
urge  the Board of Directors to take such  action as is necessary to provide for
director liability for acts or omissions  that constitute a breach of  fiduciary
duty  of  care  resulting from  a  director's gross  negligence  and/or reckless
neglect."
 
SUPPORTING STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY STOCKHOLDER
 
    "As a result of litigation recently  filed against the Company, the  Company
has  been exposed to huge potential  liabilities. The Company must defend itself
against at least  six shareholder lawsuits  alleging securities fraud,  numerous
product  liability  lawsuits and  a June  15,  1995 federal  criminal indictment
against Louisiana-Pacific and two of its employees on 56 counts, including  mail
and wire fraud. The indictment relates to alleged falsification of air emissions
information  and the conveyance  of "non-representative" product  samples to the
American Plywood Association.
 
                                       8

    "Environmental penalties and product liability  claims may cost our  Company
and its shareholders hundreds of millions of dollars, including a recent product
liability  settlement.  Continuing  legal  challenges  raise  the  likelihood of
further financial losses  for Company  shareholders. The  financial impact  from
lost consumer confidence is incalculable.
 
    "In  determining the  root cause of  these problems, the  performance of the
Board of Directors  must be scrutinized,  for it is  the responsibility of  that
body  to direct and monitor the conduct of our Company's management. The goal of
this proposal is to strengthen the oversight function of the Board of Directors.
Our Company's Articles of Incorporation currently contain a provision  exempting
corporate  directors from any personal  liability for monetary damages resulting
from a breach of fiduciary  duty of care. As a  result, a director or an  entire
board  can  commit  acts of  gross  negligence and/or  reckless  neglect without
incurring any personal liability. We strongly believe that raising the  standard
of  care for directors will improve the long-term shareholder value by producing
a more diligent Board of Directors.
 
    "Proponents of exempting directors from  personal liability for breaches  of
duty  of care  claim that without  such an  exemption, it would  be difficult to
convince qualified  persons  to  serve  on corporate  boards.  We  question  the
competency  of  directors  who  lack  confidence  in  their  abilities  to avoid
committing acts or  omissions that constitute  gross negligence and/or  reckless
neglect.  We  believe  the  appropriate  balance  between  the  need  to attract
qualified directors and the  need to have a  board that diligently performs  its
oversight  function  is  to  continue  the  exemption  of  liability  for simple
negligence, but  remove  the exemption  from  gross negligence  and/or  reckless
neglect.
 
    "The  law does NOT equate bad  business judgment with negligence. Negligence
only occurs if actions  fail the test of  prudence or responsibility. Thus,  the
courts  do not second guess individual decisions.  Rather the analysis is on the
prudence of the  decision making  process undertaken. We  strongly believe  that
holding directors personally liable for gross negligence and/or reckless neglect
will be a powerful tool in restoring public, investor and customer confidence in
our Company."
 
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL 6
 
    THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL.
 
    The  present  provisions  of  L-P's  Certificate  of  Incorporation limiting
directors' personal liability were approved by the affirmative vote of more than
97 percent of the stockholders voting at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held
in 1987.  At that  time,  the board  stated that  the  primary purpose  for  the
provision   "is  to  assure  L-P's  continued  ability  to  attract  and  retain
individuals of the highest quality and ability to serve as directors." The board
also stated that effective corporate  governance is hampered when directors  are
subject to the risk of lawsuits "second-guessing" the prudence of the directors'
business  judgments made in good  faith. Also, the board  stated its belief that
"the diligence and care exercised by directors stem primarily from their  desire
to  act in the best interests of L-P and its stockholders and not from a fear of
monetary damage  awards." The  board  believes that  these reasons  are  equally
applicable today.
 
    The  frequency with which litigation is brought against corporate directors,
the considerable expense involved in defending any lawsuit (including a  lawsuit
without  merit), and the  inherent uncertainties with respect  to the outcome of
any litigation, all combine  to make the question  of personal liability a  very
real  concern for corporate directors. The  board believes that stockholders are
better served by a Board  of Directors who are  free to exercise their  business
judgment  than by  a Board  of Directors  whose principal  concern is  their own
personal liability. The provisions of L-P's Certificate of Incorporation do  not
permit  the elimination or limitation of  liability of directors for breaches of
the duty of loyalty to the corporation (for example, liability for impermissible
self-dealing).
 
    The fact that L-P is currently facing a number of serious lawsuits does  not
diminish  the validity of these reasons  for providing directors with protection
against personal liability. The unimpeded  judgment of directors is critical  to
dealing with complex litigation.
 
    FOR  THE FOREGOING REASONS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST
THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL IN ITEM 6.
 
                                       9

    Approval of this stockholder proposal will require the affirmative vote of a
majority of the total votes  cast on this item at  the meeting. Shares that  are
not  represented at the meeting,  shares that abstain from  voting on this item,
and shares not voted on this item by brokers or nominees will not be counted for
purposes of computing a majority.
 
                         ITEM 7 -- STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
                CONCERNING COMPENSATION AND WORKPLACE PRACTICES
 
    The  following  for  proposal,  NOT  recommended  by  management,  has  been
submitted  for inclusion in the proxy statement for action at the annual meeting
by Vincent N. Icardo, Post Office Box 135, Tuolumne, California 95379:
 
    "RESOLVED: The  shareholders  of Louisiana-Pacific  Corporation  ("Company")
urge  the  Board of  Directors of  the Company  to adopt  executive compensation
policies that emphasize and reward  executives for creating a "high  performance
workplace"  that  places  a  priority  on  achieving  continuous  improvement in
productivity,   quality   and   service   through   employee   involvement    in
decision-making,  employee  compensation  linked to  performance,  and  a strong
commitment to training."
 
SUPPORTING STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY STOCKHOLDER
 
    "In 1993,  the U.S.  Department of  Labor completed  an extensive  study  of
workplace   practices  that  contributed  to   consistent,  long-term  gains  in
competitiveness and  firm value  across several  industries. The  Department  of
Labor's Office of the American Workplace reviewed available studies on the issue
and consistently found three factors -- employee involvement in decision making,
employee  compensation linked to performance and a strong commitment to training
- -- contributed to long-term gains in productivity, quality and service, which in
turn led to increased competitiveness and rising shareholder value. In 1994, the
California Public Employee Retirement System ("CalPERS"), a $95 billion  pension
fund  and major institutional shareholder, began  evaluating the extent to which
the  companies  in  its  investment   portfolio  have  implemented  these   high
performance  workplace practices.  I believe  investors are  increasingly moving
away from  emphasis  on  quarterly  profits  and  toward  a  more  sophisticated
evaluation  of factor such  as high performance workplace  practices that are at
the core of a company's competitiveness.
 
    "Harry  Merlo,  the  long-time   and  now  retired   Chairman  and  CEO   of
Louisiana-Pacific,  has  received  tens  of  millions  of  dollars  in executive
compensation. His legacy  is a Company  with a severely  damaged reputation  and
huge  potential  liabilities  resulting  from  a  torrent  of  product liability
lawsuits, securities fraud lawsuits, environmental fines and a 56 count criminal
indictment alleging  managers falsified  air  emissions reports,  falsified  the
quality  of  product samples  and  committed mail  and  wire fraud.  These suits
suggest executives have done a poor job of creating production and work  systems
that  result in  high quality products  and compliance  with pollution discharge
laws. As a long-time Company shareholder,  I believe these types of problems  do
not  simply arise in the ordinary course  of business; they are deep, structural
flaws in the executive compensation system and the production and work system.
 
    "I think executives and  facility managers will  only change their  behavior
when  they are motivated by concrete economic incentives. Accordingly, I believe
our Board  would  be  furthering  the interests  of  Louisiana-Pacific  and  its
shareholders  if  executive compensation  policies  were adopted  that  placed a
priority on  achieving  continuous  improvement  in  productivity,  quality  and
service  through employee involvement  in decision-making, employee compensation
linked to performance, and a strong commitment to training.
 
    "Shareholders need to be vigilant that CEO's are compensated at  appropriate
levels  for long-term performance and do  not reap excessive rewards for cutting
costs by illegally polluting the environment and knowingly producing substandard
product. This proposal is a challenge to  our Board of Directors and new CEO  to
lead our Company out of its woes by taking decisive, concrete steps to change to
incentive  system that  lead to  criminal indictments  and huge  potential legal
liabilities."
 
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL 7
 
    THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL IN
ITEM 7.
 
                                       10

    In the case  of this stockholder  proposal, L-P and  its Board of  Directors
believe  it is particularly  important to inform stockholders  that, as with all
stockholder proposals,  the  views expressed  are  those of  the  proponent  and
neither  L-P  nor  its  Board  of Directors  takes  any  responsibility  for the
statements of the proponent.
 
    Although the proposal nominally relates to executive compensation practices,
the clear intent of the proposal is to cause changes in L-P's ordinary  business
operations relating to product quality, employee involvement in decision making,
compensation of non-executive employees, and employee training, issues which the
board  believes are better left to the discretion of management and the Board of
Directors, rather than stockholders.
 
    The proposal is  so vague  and combines so  many different  thoughts into  a
single  proposal that  the board believes  it is impossible  for stockholders to
understand how it would be implemented.
 
    The proposal  contains  a  number  of statements  that  imply  that  certain
individuals  have engaged in  illegal activities and/or  are responsible for the
commission of illegal  acts by  L-P. The  board believes  that these  statements
improperly impugn character, integrity, and personal reputation and make charges
concerning improper conduct without factual foundation.
 
    FOR  THE FOREGOING REASONS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST
THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL IN ITEM 7.
 
    Approval of this stockholder proposal will require the affirmative vote of a
majority of the total votes  cast on this item at  the meeting. Shares that  are
not  represented at the meeting,  shares that abstain from  voting on this item,
and shares not voted on this item by brokers or nominees will not be counted for
purposes of computing a majority.
 
                                 OTHER BUSINESS
 
    At the time this proxy statement was printed, management knew of no  matters
other  than the  items of  business listed  in the  Notice of  Annual Meeting of
Stockholders which might be presented for stockholder action at the meeting.  If
any  matters other than such listed items  properly come before the meeting, the
proxies named in the accompanying form of proxy will vote or refrain from voting
thereon in accordance with their judgment.
 
                                       11

                            HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK
 
    The  following table summarizes the beneficial  ownership of Common Stock of
the directors, nominees,  executive officers, and  former executive officers  of
L-P  and of each  person or group known  to L-P to own  beneficially more than 5
percent of the outstanding shares of Common Stock:
 
COMMON STOCK BENEFICIALLY OWNED APPROXIMATE AS OF MARCH 14, PERCENT OF NAME 1996(1) CLASS - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- --------------- Pierre S. du Pont(4)........................................................ 20,000 -- James Eisses(3)............................................................. 129,241 0.1% William E. Flaherty......................................................... -0- -- Stephen R. Grant............................................................ -0- -- Bonnie Guiton Hill(4)....................................................... 27,300 -- Donald R. Kayser(3,4)....................................................... 62,597 -- J. Keith Matheney(3,4)...................................................... 21,598 -- Harry A. Merlo(5)........................................................... 1,373,837 1.3% Francine I. Neff(4)......................................................... 19,334 -- Ronald L. Paul.............................................................. -0- -- Lee C. Simpson(3)........................................................... 21,243 -- Robert M. Simpson(3)........................................................ 4,520 -- Mark A. Suwyn(6)............................................................ 153,000 0.1% Charles E. Yeager(4)........................................................ 10,400 -- All current directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)(2,3,4)............................................. 571,186 0.5% Louisiana-Pacific Hourly Employee Stock Ownership Trust(2)................................................... 3,607,288 3.3% Louisiana-Pacific Salaried Employee Stock Ownership Trust(2)................................................... 2,117,184 2.0%
- ------------------------ (1) Shares are shown as beneficially owned if the person named in the table has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting of, or the power to dispose of, or direct the disposition of, such shares. Inclusion of shares in the table does not necessarily mean that the persons named have any economic beneficial interest in shares set forth opposite their respective names. (2) One of the trustees of the L-P Hourly and Salaried Employee Stock Ownership Trusts (111 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204), is an executive officer of L-P who, in such capacity, shares voting power with respect to, and thus is considered to beneficially own, 5,724,472 shares (5.3%) of the outstanding Common Stock held in such trusts, including 2,503 shares beneficially owned by officers of L-P. These represent shares held by the trusts as to which the trustees together have sole voting power -- generally, shares which have not been allocated to individual employee accounts. (3) Includes shares held by the L-P Salaried Employee Stock Ownership Trust and beneficially owned by the following officers: Mr. Eisses, 9,200 shares; Mr. Kayser, 1,093 shares; Mr. Matheney, 6,014 shares, Mr. Lee C. Simpson, 1,093 shares; Mr. Robert M. Simpson, 4,320 shares; and all current executive officers as a group, 56,988 shares (4) Includes shares reserved for issuance under immediately exercisable options and options which will become exercisable within 60 days after March 14, 1996, as follows: Gov. du Pont, 18,500 shares; Ms. Hill, 27,000 shares; Mr. Kayser, 27,000 shares; Mr. Matheney, 10,800 shares; Mrs. Neff, 18,000 shares; Gen. Yeager, 9,000 shares; and all current executive officers as a group, 123,800 shares. (5) Includes 229,300 shares held by the Harry A. Merlo Foundation, Inc., of which Mr. Merlo is a director. (6) Includes 150,000 shares of unvested restricted stock which Mr. Suwyn has the power to vote. 12 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following material summarizes L-P's executive compensation in the format required by applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In accordance with those regulations, the material under the captions "Compensation Committee Report" and "Performance Graph" is not to be deemed "soliciting material" or "filed." COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT To the stockholders of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation: The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has overall responsibility for compensation decisions affecting the company's senior executive officer group and administers L-P's restricted stock plan and, with respect to employees who are officers or directors of L-P, its stock option plans. Decisions on salary and bonuses for divisional general managers are the responsibility of the senior executive officers. Periodically the Compensation Committee conducts a review of L-P's executive compensation program. This review includes analyzing data comparing the competitiveness of L-P's executive compensation with comparable corporations, based on corporate performance, stock price appreciation over time, and total return to stockholders over time. The comparable corporations include six companies in the Standard and Poor's Paper and Forest Products Index (excluding those which are primarily paper companies) plus one other forest products company similar in size to L-P. There is no fixed policy governing the relationship of L-P's compensation practices to the other comparable corporations. The Compensation Committee believes that corporate performance includes, in addition to stock market and financial performance, such factors as the quality of L-P's products and services; providing innovative, environmentally-friendly, and affordable building products to homebuilders; monitoring and improving L-P's environmental performance; and maintaining equitable opportunity for L-P's employees. The Compensation Committee, therefore, also takes these factors into account in making compensation decisions. Although return on equity and return to stockholders are generally given significant attention, there is no particular ranking or weighting given to the various elements of corporate performance. The Compensation Committee also bases compensation decisions on individual performance as well as corporate results. The Compensation Committee also realizes that corporations need to be competitive in compensation in order to attract and retain qualified executives. To the extent consistent with its goal of maintaining a fair and competitive compensation package, the Compensation Committee attempts to structure L-P's executive compensation to be deductible for income tax purposes by complying with applicable tax requirements, including limits on deductibility of certain types of compensation. An example is this year's submission for approval by the stockholders of performance goals for certain executive bonuses. The Compensation Committee also recognizes that, in some cases, elements of compensation for senior executives may not be deductible. A principal aim of L-P's compensation policy is to connect the interests of its executives with corporate performance and increases in stockholder value over time. Two vehicles which have been used in prior years to meet these objectives are (i) stock options, the value of which is tied to the price performance of L-P Common Stock, and (ii) restricted stock performance awards, under which the ultimate issuance of stock to the executives is contingent upon attainment of specified annual return on equity goals. In addition, the provision of retirement benefits through an employee stock ownership trust ("ESOT"), including deferred compensation in lieu of ESOT contributions, rather than a defined benefit pension plan ties the retirement income of executives closely to the long-term performance of L-P Common Stock. During 1995, significant changes occurred in L-P's executive management. L-P's three top executive officers submitted their resignations in July 1995, and two former executive officers of L-P were asked to 13 fill the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer on an interim basis. Decisions on executive compensation in 1995 were largely focused on the issues raised by these changes in personnel. In late 1994, the Compensation Committee determined to leave 1995 base salary levels for L-P's chief executive officer and other two most senior executive officers unchanged from 1994 levels. This decision was based on the substantial increases approved in executive base salaries for 1994 despite the Compensation Committee's recognition that L-P's base salaries for executives remained below the median salary and bonuses of comparable executives of the comparable forest products companies referred to above. The Compensation Committee made no grants of stock options or restricted stock performance awards to executive officers during 1995. The principal terms of severance arrangements with the three top executive officers who resigned in late July 1995 were approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting at which such resignations were accepted, following negotiations of such terms with such executives and their counsel. See "Agreements with Executive Officers" below. Donald R. Kayser and Lee C. Simpson were elected as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer, respectively, at the same board meeting. The principal terms of their employment agreements, particularly their base salaries and phantom share awards, were approved by the Compensation Committee shortly thereafter. Their base salary levels were established by negotiation and in recognition of their interim status and relative levels of responsibility and their willingness to come out of retirement at a time the corporation needed leadership, while the phantom share awards were intended to serve as an incentive to continue L-P's focus on enhancing value to its stockholders. The terms of an employment agreement with an executive officer hired in August 1995 as Senior Vice President -- Compliance were established based on negotiations recognizing the corporation's need for additional expertise in dealing with complex litigation and compliance matters. In early January 1996, the Compensation Committee considered and approved the principal terms of an employment agreement with Mark A. Suwyn, selected to serve as L-P's new permanent Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The elements of the compensation package negotiated with Mr. Suwyn were intended largely to be competitive with compensation of comparable chief executive officers, to maintain the level of certain benefits to which he expected to be entitled if he remained with his prior employer, and to serve as an incentive for future performance with L-P. Among Mr. Suwyn's responsibilities during the 1996 year will be the preparation for the Compensation Committee's consideration of a new long-term performance related compensation plan as a complement to a new strategic plan and long-term objectives for the company being developed for approval by the Board of Directors. Respectfully submitted, Pierre S. du Pont, Chairman Bonnie Guiton Hill Donald R. Kayser Francine I. Neff Charles E. Yeager 14 PERFORMANCE GRAPH The following graph is required to be included in this proxy statement under applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The graph compares the total cumulative return to investors, including dividends paid (assuming reinvestment of dividends) and appreciation or depreciation in stock price, from an investment in L-P Common Stock for the period January 1, 1991, through December 31, 1995, to the total cumulative return to investors from the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index and the Standard & Poor's Paper and Forest Products Index for the same period. Stockholders are cautioned that the graph shows the returns to investors only as of the dates noted and may not be representative of the returns for any other past or future period. EDGAR REPRESENTATION OF DATA POINTS USED IN PRINTED GRAPHIC
LOUISIANA PAC CORPORATION S & P 500 S & P PAPER & FOREST PRODUCTS 12/90 100 100 100 12/91 167 130 127 12/92 343 140 145 12/93 479 155 160 12/94 321 157 167 12/95 292 215 183
15 COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS The following table should be reviewed in light of the significant changes in L-P's executive management which occurred during 1995. On July 28, 1995, Messrs. Merlo, Eisses, and Paul submitted their resignations as officers and directors of L-P, and Donald R. Kayser and Lee C. Simpson were elected on an interim basis as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer, respectively. Both Messrs. Kayser and Simpson had previously been executive officers of L-P. In January 1996, Mark A. Suwyn was elected to replace Mr. Kayser as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer following a nationwide executive search. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG TERM COMPENSATION ------------------------- ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS PAYOUTS --------------------------- ---------- ------------- OTHER NUMBER OF LONG TERM ALL ANNUAL SECURITIES INCENTIVE OTHER NAME AND COMPEN- UNDERLYING PLAN COMPEN- PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS SATION(1) SARS(2) PAYOUTS(3) SATION(4) ---------------------------- ---- -------- -------- ------- ---------- ------------- ---------- Donald R. Kayser(5)......... 1995 $254,615 50,000 $ 65,461 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Harry A. Merlo(5)........... 1995 $554,167 $172,812 $4,156,724 Chairman and President (CEO) 1994 $825,000 $85,696 $ 4,256,250 $ 169,842 1993 $650,000 $94,669 $ 11,306,250 $ 152,342 James Eisses(5)............. 1995 $233,333 $1,201,461 Executive Vice President 1994 $389,583 $ 1,064,063 $ 63,686 1993 $375,000 $ 2,826,563 $ 62,228 Stephen R. Grant(5)......... 1995 $156,250 30,000 Senior Vice President-Compliance J. Keith Matheney(6)........ 1995 $125,000 $ 10,970 $ 15,787 General Manager, WeatherSeal 1994 $118,336 $ 57,382 $ 12,056 Division 1993 $105,000 $ 48,796 $ 240,750 $ 10,500 Ronald L. Paul(5)........... 1995 $175,000 $ 678,533 Vice President, Operations 1994 $258,333 $ 851,250 $ 27,321 1993 $200,000 $ 2,261,250 $ 21,483 Lee C. Simpson(5)........... 1995 $229,154 45,000 $ 22,915 President and Chief Operating Officer Robert M. Simpson(6)........ 1995 $158,613 $ 15,861 General Manager, Western 1994 $150,000 $ 425,625 $ 15,000 Division 1993 $150,000 $ 1,089,375 $ 16,111
- ------------------------ (1) The amounts shown as Other Annual Compensation include the estimated incremental cost to L-P of personal benefits provided to each executive officer for whom the aggregate cost exceeds the lesser of $50,000 or 10 percent of his annual salary and bonus. The amount shown for Mr. Merlo in 1995 includes $136,426 as the estimated portion of operating costs attributable to Mr. Merlo's personal use of the furnished residence rented to him as described under "Management Transactions." Other Annual Compensation does not include any amounts attributable to purchases of Common Stock pursuant to L-P's employee stock purchase plans, as all employees are eligible to participate in those plans. (2) Amounts shown represent the number of phantom shares awarded pursuant to employment agreements with Messrs. Kayser, Grant, and Simpson. See "Agreements with Executive Officers" below. One-half of the phantom shares represent the right to receive a payment in cash on August 1, 1996 (or, if earlier, the date on which the recipient ceases to be employed by L-P in the position specified in his 16 employment agreement) and the balance on August 1, 1997, in each case, equal to the excess, if any, of the market value of the Common Stock at the time (based on a 20 trading day average) over $24.625, which was the market price of the Common Stock on July 31, 1995. (3) Amounts shown represent the value (at date of issuance) of shares issued under previously granted restricted stock awards based upon L-P's attainment of performance goals in the years shown. At December 31, 1995, the number of restricted stock performance awards, and the value thereof at such date assuming all shares were vested, held by the executives subject to the future satisfaction of performance criteria were as follows: J. Keith Matheney, 15,000 shares, $363,750. (4) Amounts shown include (i) the annual contribution to L-P's funded employee stock ownership trust ("ESOT") as follows: Mr. Kayser, $15,000; Mr. Matheney, $14,248; Mr. Lee C. Simpson, $15,000; and Mr. Robert M. Simpson, $15,000; (ii) deferred compensation in connection with L-P's unfunded defined contribution plan for amounts in excess of the maximum permitted ESOT contribution (amounts contributed with respect to L-P's ESOT and unfunded defined contribution plan together equal 10 percent of salary and bonus) as follows: Mr. Kayser, $10,461; Mr. Lee C. Simpson, $7,915; and Mr. Robert M. Simpson, $861; (iii) premiums for life insurance in excess of group life insurance provided to salaried employees generally, as follows: Mr. Merlo, $18,979; Mr. Eisses, $3,386; Mr. Matheney, $1,539; and Mr. Paul, $936; (iv) amounts paid, payable or accrued pursuant to arrangements in connection with the resignations of Messrs. Merlo, Eisses and Paul in 1995 of $4,137,745, $1,198,075, and $677,597, respectively (see "Agreements with Executive Officers"); and (v) directors fees paid to Mr. Kayser in the amount of $40,000. (5) Messrs. Merlo, Eisses and Paul served in the indicated positions until their resignations on July 28, 1995. Donald R. Kayser and Lee C. Simpson were employed by L-P beginning July 28, 1995. Stephen R. Grant was employed by L-P beginning August 1, 1995. (6) In January 1996, Mr. Robert M. Simpson resigned and was replaced as General Manager, Western Division, by Mr. Matheney. AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION/SAR VALUES
SHARES NUMBER OF SECURITIES ACQUIRED UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED VALUE OF UNEXERCISED ON OPTIONS/SARS AT DECEMBER 31, IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS/SARS AT EXERCISE 1995 DECEMBER 31, 1995 DURING VALUE ---------------------------- ------------------------------ NAME 1995 REALIZED EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE - -------------------------------------- --------- ----------- ------------ -------------- -------------- -------------- Donald R. Kayser...................... -- -- 27,000 68,000 $ 152,820 $ 105,120 Harry A. Merlo........................ 840,000 $12,724,800 -- -- -- -- James Eisses.......................... 90,000 $ 1,291,500 -- -- -- -- Stephen R. Grant...................... -- -- -- 30,000 -- -- J. Keith Matheney..................... -- -- 7,200 3,600 $ 97,344 $ 48,672 Ronald L. Paul........................ 18,000 $ 261,360 -- -- -- -- Lee C. Simpson........................ -- -- -- 45,000 -- -- Robert M. Simpson..................... -- -- 12,000 24,000 $ 54,760 $ 113,520
17 MANAGEMENT TRANSACTIONS During 1995, L-P leased to Mr. Merlo a furnished residence in Portland, Oregon, which was used for numerous corporate and business functions. The rent during 1995 was $3,270 per month, based upon an independent appraisal of the reasonable rental value performed in 1994. During 1995, L-P incurred noncapitalized costs of maintaining, improving, operating, and insuring the property and real property taxes assessed with respect to the property totaling approximately $243,000, including depreciation. Mr. Merlo exercised his option to purchase the property for L-P's book value of approximately $895,000 on January 1, 1996. During 1995, L-P placed orders to purchase shares of L-P Common Stock as treasury stock and for other securities transactions with PaineWebber Incorporated through its account officer, Franklin V. Merlo, the brother of Harry A. Merlo. Total commissions on the transactions were approximately $262,740, which were based on the same rates as L-P pays to other unrelated brokerage firms. See "Item 1 -- Election of Directors; Compensation Committee -- Interlocks and Insider Participation" for a description of an additional transaction. See also "Agreements with Executive Officers." DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION Each director of L-P who is not an employee of L-P (except for Mr. Kayser for so long as he is providing consulting services to L-P) receives for all services as a director fees at the rate of $20,000 per year, plus $1,750 for each board meeting attended, $1,000 for each committee meeting attended ($1,250 for committee chairpersons) and, for participation in each telephone conference meeting, $750 for a board meeting and $500 for a committee meeting ($750 for committee chairpersons). The Board of Directors has adopted an unfunded deferred compensation plan for directors which permits outside directors to elect to defer either all compensation to be received from L-P as a director or only the annual fees. Such deferred compensation earns interest at a rate equal to the 90-day rate paid on certain high-grade commercial paper, adjusted quarterly. Payment of deferred amounts shall be made, at the director's option, in a lump sum or in substantially equal quarterly installments over a 5-year or 10-year period beginning the first quarter after he or she ceases to be a director. L-P's 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the "Director Plan") provides for the automatic granting every five years of options to purchase shares of L-P Common Stock to members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of L-P or any of its subsidiaries. Each option under the Director Plan entitles the holder to purchase 45,000 shares of Common Stock at a price equal to 85 percent of the Fair Market Value (as defined) of a share of L-P Common Stock on the date of grant. Each option becomes exercisable as to 20 percent of the shares covered by the option (i.e., 9,000 shares) on each of the first through fifth anniversaries of the date of grant. Options will become immediately exercisable upon the death of the optionee or upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined) of L-P. Each option expires ten years after the date of grant, subject to earlier termination if the optionee ceases to be a member of the Board of Directors. AGREEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS L-P has entered into an employment agreement with Mark A. Suwyn with respect to his employment as L-P's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The term of the agreement expires on December 31, 1998, subject to automatic extension annually thereafter unless 90 days' prior notice of intention to terminate is given by either party. The agreement provides that Mr. Suwyn's base salary will be a minimum of $600,000, subject to annual review for increase beginning in 1997 by the Board of Directors. The agreement also provides that Mr. Suwyn shall be entitled to an annual bonus, subject to satisfying reasonable annual performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. As contemplated by the agreement, L-P has determined to ask the stockholders to approve performance goals for Mr. Suwyn's annual bonuses in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code. See "Item 2 -- Approval of Performance Goals." 18 In February 1996, L-P paid Mr. Suwyn, pursuant to the employment agreement, a replacement bonus in the amount of $600,000, representing the amount which otherwise likely would have been payable to Mr. Suwyn by International Paper Company ("IP"), Mr. Suwyn's prior employer, as an annual performance bonus for 1995 had he not terminated his employment with IP. As further provided in the agreement, Mr. Suwyn was granted, pursuant to the terms of L-P's 1991 Employee Stock Option Plan, options to purchase 200,000 shares of L-P Common Stock at an exercise price of $25.25 per share (the closing price of the Common Stock quoted on the New York Stock Exchange on January 2, 1996). Such options will expire on January 2, 2006, and will vest in five equal annual installments beginning on January 1, 1997, subject to acceleration of exercisability upon the occurrence of certain specified events during Mr. Suwyn's term of employment, including a Change in Control of L-P (as defined). Mr. Suwyn has also been granted 150,000 restricted shares of L-P Common Stock. Mr. Suwyn will become vested as to 30,000 of such shares on each of January 1, 1997, 1998, and 1999 and the remaining 60,000 shares upon reaching age 62 while employed by L-P, subject to acceleration of vesting as to all shares (including any shares previously vested) upon the occurrence of certain specified events during Mr. Suwyn's term of employment, including a Change in Control of L-P. The agreement also provides for a nonqualified supplemental executive retirement benefit in which Mr. Suwyn is immediately vested to the extent accrued. The annual benefit payable to Mr. Suwyn (calculated as a single life annuity reduced on an actuarial basis for retirement prior to age 62) will be equal to an amount based on Mr. Suwyn's compensation (salary plus annual bonus) for the year during the three consecutive calendar years prior to termination of employment in which he had the highest compensation (including that with his previous employer), with a maximum annual benefit equal to 50 percent (less a Social Security offset) of such compensation and a minimum annual benefit equal to 25 percent of such compensation. The annual benefit so calculated will be reduced by an amount equal to benefits payable to Mr. Suwyn pursuant to L-P's ESOT and the retirement plans maintained by his prior employer. Other benefits provided under the agreement include a relocation bonus in the amount of $100,000 after tax and other standard executive relocation benefits. In the event Mr. Suwyn's employment is terminated by Mr. Suwyn for Good Reason (as defined) or by L-P for any reason other than disability or Cause (as defined), or if the agreement is not renewed pursuant to notice by L-P, Mr. Suwyn will be entitled to receive an amount equal to his base salary, as then in effect, for the remainder of the term of the agreement or 24 months, whichever is longer, plus a pro rata performance bonus for the year of termination and certain continued medical benefits. He will also be entitled to all other amounts and benefits in which he is then or thereby becomes vested, including all of the stock options and restricted shares described above. If a Change in Control occurs and Mr. Suwyn's employment terminates (including voluntarily by Mr. Suwyn) during the 13-month period following the Change in Control other than for Cause or by death or disability, Mr. Suwyn will be entitled to receive, in addition to all amounts and benefits in which he is vested, an amount equal to his base salary, as then in effect, for the remainder of the term of the agreement or 24 months, whichever is longer, together with (i) a pro rata share of the targeted annual performance bonus for the year in which such termination occurs; (ii) a bonus equal to two times the targeted annual performance bonus, if any, for such year payable in 24 equal monthly installments; (iii) employee welfare benefits substantially similar to those which he was receiving immediately prior to such termination; and (iv) two additional years of service for purposes of his supplemental retirement benefit. For purposes of the agreement, a "Change in Control" of L-P includes: certain extraordinary corporate transactions pursuant to which less than a majority of the combined voting power in L-P remains in the hands of the holders immediately prior to such transactions, a person or group (other than certain persons related to L-P) becoming the beneficial owner of 25 percent or more of the combined voting power 19 in L-P, or, with certain exceptions, the existing directors of L-P ceasing to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors. "Cause" includes continuing to fail to devote substantially all one's business time to L-P's business and affairs, engaging in certain activities competitive with L-P, or the commission of specified wrongful acts. "Good Reason" includes failure to maintain Mr. Suwyn as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, a reduction in base salary or the termination or reduction of any employee benefits, certain extraordinary corporate transactions, certain relocations of Mr. Suwyn's place of work, or any material breach of the agreement by L-P. If any payment under the agreement is determined to be subject to the federal excise tax imposed on benefits that constitute excess parachute payments under the Code, Mr. Suwyn will be entitled to reimbursement for such taxes on an after-tax basis. In connection with his employment as L-P's interim Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Donald R. Kayser entered into an employment agreement with L-P providing for an annual base salary of $600,000, together with customary employee benefits and a housing allowance of $2,500 per month. Mr. Kayser's employment under the agreement terminated on January 29, 1996. Beginning January 30, 1996, L-P engaged Mr. Kayser to provide consulting services as requested by Mr. Suwyn for a period of three months, including advice on transitional issues. As compensation for his services, Mr. Kayser will receive $22,500 plus $1,500 for each day in excess of 15 days that he is required to provide services pursuant to the agreement. Lee C. Simpson entered into an employment agreement with L-P relating to his employment as interim President and Chief Operating Officer of L-P providing for an annual base salary of $540,000, together with customary employee benefits and a housing allowance of $2,500 per month. The original expiration date of the agreement of January 29, 1996, has been extended to March 15, 1996, by mutual agreement. In connection with his employment as Senior Vice President -- Compliance on August 1, 1995, Stephen R. Grant entered into an employment agreement with L-P providing for an annual base salary of $375,000, together with customary employment benefits and a monthly $2,500 housing allowance. Mr. Grant's term of employment will expire on the date that L-P's chief executive officer either no longer requires his services or establishes a permanent position with L-P acceptable to Mr. Grant. Each of the employment agreements with Messrs. Kayser, Simpson, and Grant also provided for an award of phantom shares as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above. In connection with Harry A. Merlo's resignation as Chairman, President and Director of L-P on July 28, 1995, L-P entered into certain agreements with Mr. Merlo with respect to the termination of his employment as follows: (i) to continue his salary and employee benefits through September 15, 1995, and to pay him an additional amount in lieu of accrued vacation; (ii) to pay him a special retirement benefit in the form of a lump-sum payment in the amount of $3,200,000; (iii) to give him the $628,000 premium equity accrued in the whole life insurance policy previously maintained by L-P on his life; (iv) to make a one-time payment of $90,000 to reimburse him for the cost of obtaining office space; (v) to pay the costs of providing suitable office furniture and equipment for him and one assistant; (vi) to pay the salary (not to exceed $48,000 per year) and regular L-P employee benefits to his assistant through December 31, 1996; (vii) to sell to Mr. Merlo the company vehicles being used by him for L-P's book value totaling $23,171; and (viii) to sell to Mr. Merlo two paintings owned by L-P for an amount determined by an independent appraiser. L-P also entered into certain arrangements with James Eisses in connection with his resignation as an officer and director on July 28, 1995, as follows: (i) to continue his salary and employee benefits through September 5, 1995, and to pay him an additional amount in lieu of accrued vacation; (ii) to pay him a special retirement benefit in the form of a lump-sum payment in the amount of $800,000; (iii) to give him the $42,800 premium equity accrued in the whole life insurance policy previously maintained by L-P on his life; and (iv) to give Mr. Eisses the fully depreciated company car being used by him. L-P forgave principal and interest of $130,674 on an outstanding loan to Mr. Eisses. Mr. Eisses also entered into a 20 consulting agreement with L-P for the period from August 1, 1995, until December 31, 1997. As compensation for his consulting services, L-P agreed to pay Mr. Eisses a monthly retainer fee of $33,333 until December 31, 1995, and $11,111 per month thereafter. Mr. Eisses has agreed not to compete with L-P during the term of the consulting agreement. Ronald L. Paul received a lump-sum cash payment of $600,000, together with salary and employee benefits, including accrued vacation, through September 5, 1995, in connection with settlement of any claims against L-P which he may have had with respect to his resignation as an officer and director effective July 28, 1995. Mr. Paul also purchased several L-P motor vehicles for their book value of $36,952, and received the $12,500 premium equity accrued in the whole life insurance policy previously maintained by L-P on his life. STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS Stockholder proposals intended to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement and proxy for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of L-P must be received by L-P no later than November 28, 1996. L-P's bylaws permit business in addition to that included in its proxy materials to be presented at an annual meeting of stockholders by a stockholder of record, provided that such stockholder gives written notice thereof to the Chairman in the manner and within the time periods described under "Item 1 -- Election of Directors; Nominating Committee" above with respect to nominations for director. Such notice must include, as to each matter the stockholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting, a brief description of the business and the reason for presenting it, the name and address of the stockholder as they appear on L-P's stock ledger, a representation that the stockholder is a record holder and intends to appear at the meeting in person or by proxy to propose such business, and any material interest of the stockholder in such business. The meeting chairman shall, if the facts warrant, determine that any such business was not properly brought before the meeting and so declare to the meeting, whereupon such business shall not be transacted. GENERAL Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Section 16") requires that reports of beneficial ownership of Common Stock and changes in such ownership be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and the New York Stock Exchange by L-P's officers, directors, and certain other "reporting persons." Based solely upon a review of copies of Section 16 reports filed by L-P's reporting persons and written representations by such persons, to L-P's knowledge, all Section 16 reporting requirements applicable to such persons were complied with for the period specified in the SEC's rules governing proxy statement disclosures, except that two reports for Robert M. Simpson were each filed approximately five days late. The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by L-P. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by the use of the mails, some of the officers and regular employees of L-P, without extra compensation, may solicit proxies personally or by other means such as telephone, telecopier, telegraph, or cable. L-P will request brokers, dealers, banks, voting trustees, and their nominees, who hold Common Stock of record, to forward soliciting material to the beneficial owners of such stock and will reimburse such record holders for their reasonable expenses in forwarding material. L-P has retained D.F. King & Co., Inc., to assist in such solicitation for an estimated fee of $15,500 plus reimbursement for certain expenses. 21 EXHIBIT A LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION 1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 1. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN. This Plan shall be known as the "Louisiana-Pacific Corporation 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan." The purpose of the Plan is to permit employees of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation ("the Company") and of its Subsidiaries (as hereinafter defined) to obtain or increase a proprietary interest in the Company by permitting them to make installment purchases of shares of the Company's Common Stock (as hereinafter defined) through payroll deductions. The Plan is intended to qualify as an "employee stock purchase plan" within the meaning of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"). 2. DEFINITIONS. (a) COMMON STOCK. The Company's $1 par value common stock as presently constituted and shares of common stock which may be issued by the Company in exchange for or reclassification thereof. (b) Offering Dates. (i) FIRST OFFERING DATE. September 1, 1996. (ii) SECOND OFFERING DATE. September 1, 1997. (c) Offering Periods. (i) FIRST OFFERING PERIOD. The period beginning on September 1, 1996, and ending on September 30, 1996. (ii) SECOND OFFERING PERIOD. The period beginning on September 1, 1997, and ending on September 30, 1997. (d) Purchase Dates. (i) FIRST PURCHASE DATE. September 30, 1998, or any earlier date of purchase pursuant to subscriptions entered into during the First Offering Period. (ii) SECOND PURCHASE DATE. September 30, 1999, or any earlier date of purchase pursuant to subscriptions entered into during the Second Offering Period. (e) Purchase Periods. (i) FIRST PURCHASE PERIOD. The period beginning on October 1, 1996, and ending on September 30, 1998. (ii) SECOND PURCHASE PERIOD. The period beginning on October 1, 1997, and ending on September 30, 1999. (f) PURCHASE PRICE. The lesser of (i) the Maximum Purchase Price or (ii) the mean between the reported high and low sale prices of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange -- Composite Transactions on the applicable Purchase Date or on the last day preceding such date on which such Exchange shall have been open. The Purchase Price per share shall be subject to adjustment in accordance with the provisions of Section 18 of this Plan. (g) MAXIMUM PURCHASE PRICE. 85 percent of the mean between the reported high and low sale prices of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange -- Composite Transactions on the last day preceding the applicable Offering Date on which such Exchange shall have been open. A-1 (h) ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES. Those persons who on the applicable Offering Date are employees of the Company or a Subsidiary except those who, immediately prior to the applicable Offering Date, would be deemed under Section 423(b)(3) of the Code to own stock possessing 5 percent or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or any other corporation that constitutes a parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company within the meaning of that section. (i) PARTICIPANT. An Eligible Employee who subscribes for the purchase of shares of Common Stock under the Plan in accordance with the Plan. (j) MONTHLY COMPENSATION. For an Eligible Employee on the payroll of the Company or a Subsidiary for the entire calendar month preceding the applicable Offering Date, the compensation paid or accrued to such Eligible Employee for such month plus, in the case of such an Eligible Employee whose compensation for such month was based wholly or partly on a bonus, commission, profit sharing or similar arrangement for which no accrual was made for such month, an amount equal to the portion attributable to one month of the amount accrued to such Eligible Employee as of the day preceding the applicable Offering Date, on the books of the Company or its Subsidiaries in accordance with such arrangement. For all other Eligible Employees, Monthly Compensation shall be the monthly rate of compensation in effect immediately prior to the applicable Offering Date. For all purposes of the Plan, Monthly Compensation shall include any amount which is contributed by the Company or a Subsidiary pursuant to a salary reduction agreement and which is not includable in the gross income of an Eligible Employee under Code Sections 125 (relating to "cafeteria plans") or 402(a)(8) (relating to elective contributions under a "401(k)" plan). (k) SUBSIDIARY. A corporation of which, on the applicable Offering Date, the Company or a subsidiary of the Company owns at least 51 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock and whose employees are authorized to participate in the Plan by the Board of Directors of the Company. 3. THE OFFERING. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Plan shall be 1,500,000, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 18 below. During each Offering Period the Company may offer, at the applicable Purchase Price, for subscription by Eligible Employees in accordance with the terms of the Plan, such number of authorized and unissued or treasury shares of its Common Stock subject to the Plan as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company. 4. SUBSCRIPTIONS. (A) SHARES SUBJECT TO SUBSCRIPTION. During each Offering Period, each Eligible Employee shall be entitled to subscribe for the number of whole shares of Common Stock offered during such Offering Period designated by him in accordance with the terms of the Plan; provided, however, that the minimum number of such shares that may be subscribed for shall be the number of whole shares that can be purchased, at the Maximum Purchase Price for such Offering Period, with $600, and the maximum number of such shares that may be subscribed for shall be the number of whole shares that can be purchased, at the Maximum Purchase Price for such Offering Period, with the lesser of (i) $21,240 or (ii) 50 percent of the Eligible Employee's Monthly Compensation multiplied by 24. (b) FURTHER LIMITATION ON SUBSCRIPTIONS. Notwithstanding Section 4(a) above, the maximum number of shares that may be subscribed for by an Eligible Employee shall be further limited and reduced to the extent that the number of shares owned by such Eligible Employee immediately after any Offering Date for purposes of Section 423(b)(3) of the Code plus the maximum number of shares set forth in Section 4(a) above would exceed 5 percent of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or a parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company within the meaning set forth in Section 423(b)(3) of the Code. (c) SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENTS. Subscriptions pursuant to the Plan shall be evidenced by the completion and execution of subscription agreements in the form provided by the Company and delivery of such agreements to the Company, at the place designated by the Company, prior to the A-2 expiration of each Offering Period. Except as provided in the Plan, no subscription agreement shall be subject to termination or reduction during the Offering Period to which it relates without written consent of the Company. (d) OVER SUBSCRIPTION. In the event that the aggregate number of shares subscribed for pursuant to the Plan as of any Purchase Date shall exceed the number of shares offered for sale during the Offering Period related to such Purchase Date, then each subscription for such Offering Period pursuant to which a purchase is effected shall be reduced to the number of shares that such subscription would cover in the event of a proportionate reduction of all subscriptions for such Offering Period outstanding on such Purchase Date so that the aggregate number of shares subject to all such subscriptions would not exceed the number of shares offered for sale during such Offering Period. In making such reductions, fractions of shares shall be disregarded and each subscription shall be for a whole number of shares. 5. APPROVAL OF STOCKHOLDERS. The Plan shall be submitted for approval by stockholders of the Company prior to March 19, 1997. Subscriptions shall be subject to the condition that, prior to such date, the Plan shall be approved by the stockholders of the Company in the manner contemplated by Section 423(b)(2) of the Code and Treasury Regulation Section 1.423-2(c). If not so approved prior to such date, the Plan shall terminate, all subscriptions hereunder shall be canceled and be of no further force and effect, and all Participants shall be entitled to the prompt refund in cash of all sums withheld from and paid by them pursuant to the Plan. 6. PAYMENT OF PURCHASE PRICE. Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Plan, the Purchase Price of all shares purchased hereunder shall be paid in equal installments (in the currency in which the Participant is paid) through payroll deduction from the Participant's compensation during the applicable Purchase Period, without the right of prepayment. Each installment shall be in an amount (in the currency in which the Participant is paid) calculated as of the Offering Date to be equal to the Maximum Purchase Price multiplied by the number of shares subscribed for divided by twice the number of annual pay periods for such Participant, with appropriate adjustment of future payroll deductions for a Participant whose payroll period changes. A Participant shall pay the amount of any difference between the Purchase Price and the amount so withheld in cash not later than the applicable Purchase Date; there shall be an appropriate reduction in the number of shares to be purchased by a Participant who fails to make such a required payment. 7. APPLICATION OF FUNDS; PARTICIPANTS' ACCOUNTS. All amounts withheld from and paid by Participants hereunder shall be deposited in the Company's general corporate account to be used for any corporate purposes; provided, however, that the Company shall maintain a separate bookkeeping account for each Participant hereunder reflecting all amounts withheld from and paid by such Participant with respect to each Purchase Period under the Plan. No interest shall be credited to such separate accounts. 8. ISSUANCE OF SHARES. Shares purchased under the Plan shall, for all purposes, be considered to have been issued, sold and purchased at the close of business on the applicable Purchase Date. Prior to each applicable Purchase Date, no Participant shall have any rights as a holder of any shares covered by a subscription agreement. Promptly after each Purchase Date, the Company shall issue and deliver to the Participant a stock certificate or certificates representing the whole number of shares purchased by him during the Purchase Period ending with such Purchase Date and refund to the Participant in cash any excess amount in his account relating to such Purchase Period. No adjustment shall be made for dividends or for the other rights for which the record date is prior to the applicable Purchase Date, except as may otherwise be provided in Section 18. 9. RIGHT TO TERMINATE SUBSCRIPTION. Each Participant shall have the right, at any time after the expiration of each Offering Period and prior to the applicable Purchase Date, to terminate his subscription relating to such Offering Period by written notice to the Company and receive a prompt refund in cash of the total amount in his account with respect to the applicable Purchase Period. A-3 10. RIGHT TO REDUCE NUMBER OF SHARES. Each Participant shall have the right, at any time after the expiration of each Offering Period and prior to the applicable Purchase Date, to make, by written notice to the Company, a one-time-only reduction in the number of shares covered by his subscription agreement relating to such Offering Period. Upon such reduction of shares, an appropriate reduction shall be made in the Participant's future payroll deductions during the applicable Purchase Period and the excess amount in the Participant's account with respect to such Purchase Period resulting from such reduction shall be promptly refunded to the Participant in cash or, at the option of the Participant, shall be applied in equal amounts against all future installment payments of the Maximum Purchase Price of the reduced number of shares to be purchased during the applicable Purchase Period. 11. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT. Upon termination of employment of a Participant for any reason other than retirement, disability or death, including by reason of the sale of the Subsidiary by which the Participant is employed such that the Company or a Subsidiary of the Company no longer owns at least 51 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Subsidiary, a Participant shall have, during the period of three months following his termination date, but prior to the applicable Purchase Date, the right with respect to each Purchase Period for which he has an account under the Plan to elect to receive either a refund in cash of the total amount of his account relating to such Purchase Period or the whole number of shares that can be purchased at the applicable Purchase Price with such amount together with any remaining cash in his account relating to such Purchase Period. Each election must be in writing and delivered to the Company within the aforementioned period. If the Participant elects to receive shares, the Purchase Date shall be the date the Participant's election is delivered to the Company. In the event the Participant does not make a timely election with respect to any Purchase Period for which he has an account under the Plan, he shall be deemed to have elected to receive a cash refund of the amount of his account relating to such Purchase Period. 12. RETIREMENT; DISABILITY. A Participant who retires or whose employment is terminated by reason of any injury or illness of such a serious nature as to disable the Participant from resuming employment with the Company shall have all of the rights described in Section 11 above and shall have the additional right to elect, in the manner described in Section 11, to prepay in cash in a lump sum the entire unpaid balance of the Purchase Price of the shares covered by his subscription agreement relating to each Purchase Period and to receive such shares. The Purchase Date for this purpose shall be the date on which both the Participant's election and the lump-sum cash payment shall have been delivered to the Company. For purposes of the Plan, a termination of employment at or after age 60 for any reason shall be considered retirement. 13. DEATH. In the event of the death of a Participant while in the employ of the Company or a Subsidiary and prior to full payment of the Maximum Purchase Price for the shares covered by his subscription with respect to each Purchase Period, or the death of a retired or disabled Participant prior to the exercise of his rights described in Section 12 above, his personal representative shall have, during the period of three months following termination of the Participant's employment, but prior to the applicable Purchase Date, the rights described in Section 12. In the event of the death of a Participant who previously terminated employment by reason other than retirement or disability prior to full payment of the Maximum Purchase Price for the shares covered by his subscription with respect to each Purchase Period and prior to the exercise of his rights described in Section 11, his personal representative shall have the rights described in Section 11. 14. TERMINATION, RETIREMENT OR DEATH PRIOR TO STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL. Notwithstanding Sections 11, 12, and 13, if the Plan shall not have been approved by stockholders of the Company as described in Section 5 prior to the time for the exercise of any rights described in Sections 11, 12 or 13, the Participant or his personal representative shall only have, under said Sections, the right to receive a refund in cash of the total amount in his account with respect to each Purchase Period. 15. TEMPORARY LAYOFF; LEAVES OF ABSENCE. A Participant's installment payments with respect to each Purchase Period shall be suspended during any period of absence from work due to temporary layoff or leave of absence without pay. If such Participant returns to active employment within the applicable A-4 Purchase Period, installment payments shall resume and the Participant shall be entitled to elect either to make up the deficiency in his account with respect to such Purchase Period immediately with a lump-sum cash payment, or to have future installments with respect to such Purchase Period uniformly increased to make up the deficiency, or to have an appropriate reduction made in the number of shares covered by his subscription agreement with respect to such Purchase Period to eliminate the deficiency. The election (together with the lump-sum cash payment, if applicable) must be delivered to the Company within 10 days of the Participant's return to active employment but prior to the applicable Purchase Date. If the Participant fails to make a timely election, the appropriate reduction of shares shall be made in accordance with the above. If the Participant does not return to active employment within the applicable Purchase Period, he shall have the right to elect to receive either a refund in cash of the total amount of his account with respect to such Purchase Period or the whole number of shares which can be purchased at the applicable Purchase Price with such amount together with any remaining cash in his account with respect to the Purchase Period. The election must be in writing and delivered to the Company prior to, and shall be effective as of, the applicable Purchase Date. In the event the Participant does not make a timely election with respect to any Purchase Period, he shall be deemed to have elected to receive the cash refund with respect to that Purchase Period. 16. INSUFFICIENCY OF COMPENSATION. In the event that for any payroll period, for reasons other than termination of employment for any reason, temporary layoff or leave of absence without pay, a Participant's compensation (after all other proper deductions from his compensation) becomes insufficient to permit the full withholding of his installment payment, the Participant may pay the deficiency in cash when it becomes due. In the event that, in a subsequent payroll period, the Participant's compensation becomes sufficient to make the full installment payment and there still remains a deficiency in his account, the deficiency must then be eliminated through the election of one of the alternatives described in Section 15. The Participant must deliver his election to the Company within 10 days of the end of such subsequent payroll period but prior to the applicable Purchase Date. In the event that on the applicable Purchase Date there remains a deficiency in such a Participant's account or, in the event a Participant described above fails to make a timely election, the appropriate reduction of shares shall be made in accordance with Section 15. 17. INTEREST. Any person who becomes entitled to receive any amount of cash refund from any account maintained for him pursuant to any provision of the Plan shall be entitled to receive in cash, at the same time, simple interest on the amount of such refund at the rate of 6 percent per annum. Any refund shall be deemed to be made from the most recent payment or payments made by the Participant pursuant to the Plan. 18. EFFECT OF CERTAIN STOCK TRANSACTIONS. If at any time prior to the second Purchase Date the Company shall effect a subdivision of shares of Common Stock or other increase (by stock dividend or otherwise) of the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, without the receipt of consideration by the Company or another corporation in which it is financially interested and otherwise than in discharge of the Company's obligation to make further payment for assets theretofore acquired by it or such other corporation or upon conversion of stock or other securities issued for consideration, or shall reduce the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding by a consolidation of shares, then (a) in the event of such an increase in the number of such shares outstanding, the number of shares then remaining subject to the Plan and the number of shares of Common Stock then subject to Participants' subscription agreements shall be proportionately increased and the Maximum Purchase Price and the Purchase Price per share for each Purchase Period affected by such event shall be proportionately reduced and (b) in the event of such a reduction in the number of such shares outstanding, the number of shares then remaining subject to the Plan and the number of shares of Common Stock then subject to subscription agreements shall be proportionately reduced and the Maximum Purchase Price and the Purchase Price per share for each Purchase Period affected by such event shall be proportionately increased. Except as provided in this Section 18, no adjustment shall be made under the Plan or any subscription agreement by reason of any dividend or other distribution declared or paid by the Company. A-5 19. MERGER, CONSOLIDATION, LIQUIDATION OR DISSOLUTION. In the event of any merger or consolidation of which the Company is not to be the survivor (or in which the Company is the survivor but becomes a subsidiary of another corporation), or the liquidation or dissolution of the Company, each Participant shall have the right immediately prior to such event to elect to receive the number of whole shares that can be purchased at the Purchase Price applicable to each Purchase Period with respect to which such Participant has subscribed for purchase of Common Stock with the full amount that has been withheld from and paid by him pursuant to the subscription agreement relating to such Purchase Period, together with any remaining excess cash in his account relating to such Purchase Period. If such election is not made with respect to the amount in a Participant's account for any Purchase Period, the Participant's subscription agreement shall terminate and he shall receive a prompt refund in cash of the total amount in such account. 20. LIMITATION ON RIGHT TO PURCHASE. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, if at any time a Participant is entitled to purchase shares of Common Stock on a Purchase Date, taking into account such Participant's rights, if any, to purchase Common Stock under the Plan and all other stock purchase plans of the Company and of other corporations that constitute parent or subsidiary corporations of the Company within the meaning of Sections 425(e) and (f) of the Code, the result would be that, during the then current calendar year, such Participant would have first become entitled to purchase under the Plan and all such other plans a number of shares of Common Stock of the Company that would exceed the maximum number of shares permitted by the provisions of Section 423(b)(8) of the Code, then the number of shares that such Participant shall be entitled to purchase pursuant to the Plan on such Purchase Date shall be reduced by the number that is one more than the number of shares that represents the excess, and any excess amount in his account resulting from such reduction shall be promptly refunded to him in cash. 21. NON-ASSIGNABILITY. None of the rights of an Eligible Employee under the Plan or any subscription agreement entered into pursuant hereto shall be transferable by such Eligible Employee otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and during the lifetime of an Eligible Employee such rights shall be exercisable only by him. 22. SHARES NOT PURCHASED. Shares of Common Stock subject to the Plan that are not subscribed for during the First Offering Period and shares subscribed for pursuant to the First Offering Period that thereafter cease to be subject to any subscription agreement hereunder shall remain subject to and reserved for use in connection with the Second Offering Period. Shares of Common Stock subject to the Plan that are not subscribed for during the Second Offering Period and shares subscribed for during the Second Offering Period that thereafter cease to be subject to any subscription agreement hereunder shall be free from reservation for use in connection with the Plan. 23. CONSTRUCTION; ADMINISTRATION. All questions with respect to the construction and application of the Plan and subscription agreements thereunder and the administration of the Plan shall be settled by the determination of the Board of Directors or of one or more other persons designated by it, which determinations shall be final, binding and conclusive on the Company and all employees and other persons. All Eligible Employees shall have the same rights and privileges under the Plan. The Purchase Price, the Maximum Purchase Price, and the amount in each Participant's account shall be denominated in United States dollars and amounts received from or paid to any Participant in any other currency shall be converted into United States dollars at the exchange rate in effect on the date of receipt or payment. 24. TERMINATION OR AMENDMENT. The Plan may be terminated or amended in any way by the Board of Directors at any time prior to approval of the Plan by the stockholders of the Company pursuant to Section 5. Subsequent to such approval of the Plan by the stockholders of the Company, the Plan may be amended by the Board of Directors, provided that no such amendment shall (a) adversely affect the rights of employees under subscription agreements theretofore entered into pursuant to the Plan or (b) increase the maximum number of shares of Common Stock offered under the Plan or decrease the price per share, except pursuant to Section 18. A-6 LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION P PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS r FOR ANNUAL MEETING MAY 6, 1996 O X The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Bonnie Guiton Hill, Lee C. Y Simpson, and Charles E. Yeager and each of them, his true and lawful agents and proxies, each with full power of substitution, to represent and vote the common stock of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation ("L-P"), which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of L-P stockholders to be held May 6, 1996, or at any adjournment thereof. Nominees for Election as Directors: Pierre S. du Pont, William E. Flaherty, Donald R. Kayser YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SPECIFY YOUR CHOICES BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE BOXES ON THE REVERSE SIDE. YOU NEED NOT MARK ANY BOXES IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDATIONS. BY SIGNING ON THE REVERSE, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THE 1996 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT AND REVOKE ALL PROXIES HERETOFORE GIVEN BY YOU TO VOTE AT SAID MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT THEREOF. ----------- SEE REVERSE SIDE ----------- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DETACH AND RETURN PROXY CARD; RETAIN ADMISSION TICKET ADMISSION TICKET Louisiana-Pacific LOGO "Louisiana-Pacific has always been a leader in its industry--developing new technologies and creating new products in response to the needs of its customers. Louisiana-Pacific has a heritage of seeking innovative solutions to customer needs. Generally, we have accomplished significant growth without developing large bureaucracies that can overburden costs. Without diminishing those very positive qualities, I am embarking on a plan to add disciplined, predictable business processes to all activities of the company. My goal is to assure consistency and quality in everything we do. I also strongly believe in engaging and empowering employees in these activities, so that together we can deliver increased shareholder value." -- Mark A. Suwyn Chairman and CEO From the Letter to Stockholders in the 1995 Louisiana-Pacific Annual Report. __ | --- PLEASE MARK YOUR | | 9319 X VOTES AS IN THIS |____ --- EXAMPLE. This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR election of directors, FOR proposals 2,3 and 4, and AGAINST proposals 5, 6 and 7. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS, FOR PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR WITHHELD FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 1. Election of --- --- 2. Approval of --- --- --- Directors --- --- performance --- --- --- (see reverse) goals. FOR all nominees except as marked to the contrary below: 3. Approval of 1996 --- --- --- Employee Stock --- --- --- _____________________________ Purchase Plan. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 4. Approval of --- --- --- accountants. --- --- --- - ------------------------------------------------- THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST PROPOSALS 5, 6 AND 7. - ----------------------------------------------------- FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 5. Stockholder proposal, NOT --- --- --- recommended by management, --- --- --- relating to classification of the board of directors. 6. Stockholder proposal, NOT --- --- --- recommended by management --- --- --- relating to director liability. 7. Stockholder proposal, NOT --- --- --- recommended by management --- --- --- relating to compensation and workplace policies. - ----------------------------------------------------- If any other matters properly come before the meeting, this proxy will be voted by the proxies named herein in accordance with their best judgment. SIGNATURE(S)_____________________________________________ DATE_______________ NOTE: Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon. If signing for estates, trusts, or corporations, title or capacity should be stated. If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. - ---------------------------------------- I/We plan to attend the Annual Meeting --- (Admission Ticket attached) --- - ---------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DETACH AND RETURN PROXY CARD; RETAIN ADMISSION TICKET Louisiana-Pacific LOGO Annual Meeting of Stockholders ADMISSION TICKET The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation will be held at 9:30 a.m. on May 6, 1996, at The Benson Hotel, 309 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204. Public transportation to the hotel is available from the airport, and there is ample public parking in the vicinity of the hotel. Your voted proxy card should be detached and returned as soon as possible in the enclosed postpaid envelope. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please mark the attendance box on the proxy card, and retain this Admission Ticket. The use of admission tickets expedites registration of shareholders at the Annual Meeting and is helpful to us in making arrangements for the meeting. On May 6, 1996, please present this Admission Ticket to the Louisiana-Pacific representative at the entrance to the Annual Meeting. -- Anton C. Kirchhof General Counsel and Secretary